Viewing Single Post From: Question

Viewing Single Post From: Question
BoneZ	Jul 3 2009, 10:30 AM
Posts: 725 Group: Members Member #269 Joined: 02/03/08	KenyonG He said it pulled up to miss the sign, which implies that it didn't pull up to fly over the pentagon, but to miss an obstacle on its way to the pentagon. You obviously have no concept of how planes handle. It is impossible to pull up to miss a sign only a couple/few hundred meters from the Pentagon, then make the aircraft perfectly level and hit the Pentagon. Remember, the alleged plane came across the highway and lawn perfectly level as depicted in the DoD video: You can't pull up over the sign in front of the Pentagon, and do the above in the video at the same time. That means somebody is lying. Would it be the witnesses that have nothing to gain, or the government which had everything to gain, i.e. the huge injection of military funding and multiple wars? KenyonG I think we need to focus on why no questions about the impact or why they believed it impacted the pentagon. Craig can't answer for them. They need to be on record so that we can truly evaluate what they think they saw. Then what you can do is get off your ass and contact these witnesses yourself and ask them the questions you want to ask them. Make sure you get it recorded because nobody will just take your word for it.
Posts: 725 Group: Members Member #269 Joined: 02/03/08

Question · Skeptics