|
Viewing Single Post From: Question
|
|
KenyonG
|
Jul 2 2009, 07:51 PM
|
|
- Posts:
- 113
- Group:
- Skeptics
- Member
- #1,215
- Joined:
- 06/15/09
|
- tuatara
- Jul 2 2009, 03:24 PM
Knew we could rely on you KenyonG.
Why don't you start from the lightpoles? All of the people interviewed on the film describe a flightpath where the plane wasn't even near the lightpoles. Only one person describes the plane hitting the lightpoles (the cab driver Lloyd England). That would seem to be a problem for the official account of 9/11. Please explain to me why the cab driver's account is accurate (even though uncorroborated by anybody) and all of the eyewitnesses in NSA are all incorrect in a very similar way?
I think we need to focus on why no questions about the impact or why they believed it impacted the pentagon. Craig can't answer for them. They need to be on record so that we can truly evaluate what they think they saw. In order to say they deduced or was fooled, we need to know what they saw that caused them to deduce. It will give more info into this person and whether he is credible. If someone says that it flew noc and impacted, that person looses credibility if they both can't be true. You can't trust their judgement, if they insist both are true.
|
|
|
2:17 AM Nov 30
