ozzybinoswald

Jul 2 2009, 03:32 PM

JFK

Jul 2 2009, 03:08 PM

ozzybinoswald

Jul 2 2009, 02:49 PM

ozzybinoswald

Jun 20 2009, 01:08 PM

Craig Ranke CIT

Apr 18 2009, 12:03 AM

22205

Apr 18 2009, 12:00 AM

does anyone know how that pic came to be associated with this harley guy / humphrey drama?

I got a forwarded email with that pic mixed in with the Humprey IMDB pics.

Craig,

Who created the email that was forwarded to you with the mixed identifications?

It would be very productive if you would upload a screencap of that message here. This is the sort of trail that will lead us to the center of this disinformation cover-up operation and from there all things are possible.


Thanks in advance.

-Oz.


http://911-harley-shirt-guy.blogspot.com

Craig,

Why won't you divulge the source of the disinformation?

I think it was you yourself. I always did.

So whose employ are you in? Who hired you?

http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/boardrules/

Quote:

 

No Tolerance of Personal Attacks

Due to the increased debate on the issue of what happened at the Pentagon, any personal insults, attacks, threats, etc, will be dealt with strictly. There will be absolutely no tolerance of personal attacks, name-calling, mocking, or insults on Pilots For 911 Truth(P4T), Citizen Investigation Team, the individuals who represent those organizations, and the same respect will also be shown to those who disagree with the aforementioned organizations. There will also be absolutely no tolerance of accusations of “disinfo” against members of our forums. Trolls, NPTers, and troublemakers are dealt with as strictly as possible and WE will take care of punishing them. If you feel a post warrants the attention of the LC administration, click the “REPORT” button of the post you’d like to bring to our attention. We all have a common goal here of finding out what really happened on 9/11 and we all need to work together to reach that goal. If you’re so confident that you know the specifics of what really happened and that your research is correct, exude a little confidence in your ideas and resist the urge to post something specifically designed to elicit an emotional response from those who disagree with you. This is not the Jerry Springer Show. Childish mudslinging, name-calling, and personal attacks, as we’ve all seen in the past, do nothing but ruin our credibility as legitimate researchers and divide the movement. We’re not all going to agree, so let’s be mature about it when it happens.

First and only warning.

Why can't Craig answer the pertinent question with the same speed with which this warning came?