Viewing Single Post From: Question

Viewing Single Post From: Question
Aldo Marquis CIT	Jul 2 2009, 02:30 PM
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	KenyonG Jul 2 2009, 02:01 PM Quote: Of course you don't have a clue as to how they were fooled, but they HAD TO BE in order for noc to be true? Don't put words in my mouth. I do have a clue, actually. NoC is true no matter how you try your funky little lawyerspeak tactics. This is a military psy-op deception, keep it in perspective. Quote: If Robert T was saying that the pull up over the pentagon started at the highway sign, how could it appear to hit the building? Hmmmmm, gee. Well maybe that huge fireball had something to do with that. Quote: Most people would see a plane flying up and away from the pentagon, if it started ascending at the highway. You're right, depending on where they were located......oh and whether they dropped to the ground, covered up, shielded themselves. And some I am sure were confused but assumed it hit anyway, like Maria De La Cerda, who was puzzled by the "side impact", because she thought it hit "on top" or "on the other side". Quote: I think it would have been better if you asked him more details. He said it pulled up to miss the sign, which implies that it didn't pull up to fly over the pentagon, but to miss an obstacle on its way to the pentagon. That is why the next question should have been, "did it continue to ascend or did it dip back down after it cleared the sign". I am not sure why the hell you would believe that or why would we would have to ask, if it is on the north side of the Citgo and if it pulled up, IT DID NOT "dip back down after it cleared the sign" the only thing it could have done was fly over or away from the building. But you, Kenyon, my skeptical little friend, are more than welcome to take your anonymous self down to Arlington to ask him yourself. Quote: If I am not mistaken he believes the plane hit the pentagon. If it pulled up at the highway, why would he believe it hit the pentagon? You are mistaken. In the video, at the time he was filmed, on that day, he BELIEVED the plane hit the Pentagon. He also did not believe it was an American Airlines and he claimed to know what one looked like. Quote: He could clearly see the roof of the pentagon, so if the plane flew over he should have seen it. Really? You know that how? From watching the interview of him? You know how big that fireball was from his perspective?Hmmmmmm? You know he didn't drop to the ground below the mound right at flash bang moment then looked up after the fireball began to develop? You know that for a fact? Quote: If he says that he didn't see the impact, because he couldn't see the base of the pentagon, then the plane had to go near the base and had to impact. He also could be deducing this detail because the event happened so fast and saw the later damage from the aftermath, which would be obscured from the view point of the Citgo. Quote: He saw the plane right before the explosion? Why not ask him where the plane was right before the explosion? Was it flying towards the roof or towards the base? I don't know, didn't I explain it enough to you? NoC=flyover, NoC + witnessed pull-up ascent REALLY=flyover
Posts: 1,649 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08

Question · Skeptics