Viewing Single Post From: Question

Viewing Single Post From: Question
KenyonG	Jul 2 2009, 02:01 PM
Posts: 113 Group: Skeptics Member #1,215 Joined: 06/15/09	Aldo Marquis CIT Jul 2 2009, 12:58 PM KenyonG Jul 2 2009, 12:07 PM For instance, the fact that Lagasse says both impact and noc are true, would discredit him, if both can not be true. It doesn't mean he's malicious or anything, it just proves that he is inaccurate and will lead some to not trust his judgement. I didn't even read your whole post. This is bullshit. Lagasse was fooled. He was sure about the north side, he admitted not seeing what the plane did because of the fireball. Lagasse was corroborated by 12 other people. What are you not getting? The event was designed to fool people. He was fooled. He confirmed the north side approach. What are you not getting? Of course you don't have a clue as to how they were fooled, but they HAD TO BE in order for noc to be true? If Robert T was saying that the pull up over the pentagon started at the highway sign, how could it appear to hit the building? Most people would see a plane flying up and away from the pentagon, if it started ascending at the highway. I think it would have been better if you asked him more details. He said it pulled up to miss the sign, which implies that it didn't pull up to fly over the pentagon, but to miss an obstacle on its way to the pentagon. That is why the next question should have been, "did it continue to ascend or did it dip back down after it cleared the sign". If I am not mistaken he believes the plane hit the pentagon. If it pulled up at the highway, why would he believe it hit the pentagon? He could clearly see the roof of the pentagon, so if the plane flew over he should have seen it. If he says that he didn't see the impact, because he couldn't see the base of the pentagon, then the plane had to go near the base and had to impact. He saw the plane right before the explosion? Why not ask him where the plane was right before the explosion? Was it flying towards the roof or towards the base?


Question · Skeptics