Viewing Single Post From: Question

Viewing Single Post From: Question
Aldo Marquis CIT	Jul 2 2009, 12:58 PM
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08	KenyonG Jul 2 2009, 12:07 PM For instance, the fact that Lagasse says both impact and noc are true, would discredit him, if both can not be true. It doesn't mean he's malicious or anything, it just proves that he is inaccurate and will lead some to not trust his judgement. I didn't even read your whole post. This is bullshit. Lagasse was fooled. He was sure about the north side, he admitted not seeing what the plane did because of the fireball. Lagasse was corroborated by 12 other people. What are you not getting? The event was designed to fool people. He was fooled. He confirmed the north side approach. What are you not getting?
Posts: 1,650 Group: Members Member #13 Joined: 01/14/08

Question · Skeptics