| Viewing Single Post From: Question | |
|---|---|
| Aldo Marquis CIT | Jul 2 2009, 12:27 PM |
|
Well I don't think you understand the first problem with the plane approaching on the north side of the gas station in the first place. You should read this: http://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com/faq-can_north_side_plane_hit.html Secondly, Robert describes a very drastic ascent with his hand. He also describes it happening over the do-not-enter sign.    You do understand the plane is supposed to be low and level, in a slight nose down attitude over the bridge at this point right? I don't see how anyone can even conceive of the plane going nose down to slip into the first floor at the speed it would have been traveling, as unknown as that factor may be. Besides the issue regarding directional damage ou also have to account for: -The low and level thingy seen in the surveillance video -Roosevelt Roberts Jr seeing the plane fly away -The FDR heading in the NTSB data require a south of the Citgo plane, it was on the north side, this means the data is fraudelant and did not come from a plane that pulled up and then went down into tht Pentagon -The staged light poles that also point towards flyover. Edited by Aldo Marquis CIT, Jul 2 2009, 12:29 PM.
|
 |
|
| Question · Skeptics | |
10:47 AM Dec 1
