Viewing Single Post From: If it was a controlled demolition then . . .

Viewing Single Post From: If it was a controlled demolition then . . .
JFK	Jun 29 2009, 11:04 PM
Posts: 4,218 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08	beantownfan247 Jun 29 2009, 10:51 PM Nope, I do not agree with that at all. I did not say that they were indestructable. I said they are notoriously strong. Ok, so you guys (nobody in preticular) say that because the debris were spread out all over the area, that it was a CD. But yet, WTC7 was also a controlled demolition but its debris was in a relitively contained pile. (Minus the fact that 2 other buildings were severely damaged because of the collapse) So, how can it be both?? Wrong. We argue that it was a CD because of all the steel failing in the manner in which it did. If a legitimate CD team had been called to demolish the towers they would not have achieved as good of a result IMO.
Posts: 4,218 Group: Admins Member #108 Joined: 01/17/08

If it was a controlled demolition then . . . · Skeptics