| Viewing Single Post From: If it was a controlled demolition then . . . | |
|---|---|
| beantownfan247 | Jun 29 2009, 10:51 PM |
|
Nope, I do not agree with that at all. I did not say that they were indestructable. I said they are notoriously strong. Ok, so you guys (nobody in preticular) say that because the debris were spread out all over the area, that it was a CD. But yet, WTC7 was also a controlled demolition but its debris was in a relitively contained pile. (Minus the fact that 2 other buildings were severely damaged because of the collapse) So, how can it be both?? |
 |
|
| If it was a controlled demolition then . . . · Skeptics | |
2:14 PM Dec 7
