| Viewing Single Post From: We Never Went to the Moon | |
|---|---|
| weasel_turbine | Jun 29 2009, 09:24 PM |
|
Where are all these mythical viewers DavidC? And this debating hall? Where is that? Are you in one? I'm not. I doubt HeadLikeARock is. If you think you're in a debating hall then you might want to get your head examined. Here's a newsflash for you. You're on an internet forum. Shocking I know. Its not run like a debating hall. It isn't moderated like a debating hall. It is NOT a debating hall. Your insistence that it is somehow similar is comical though. It provides us all with laughs. But while you're on the subject of this nonexistent debating hall, how do you think your actions would be judged in it? How would your lame, rigged credibility tests be looked upon? How would your consistent dodging of the evidence be looked upon? How would your acting like a total twat and expecting to get treated nicely act in various forums get looked upon? There wouldn't be time for anybody else to get laughed out of your nonexistent debating hall because everybody would be too busy laughing at you. As for your lame questions, you know damn well they are NOT simple yes or no questions. That is probably why you keep asking them. Do you really think people can't see through your lame tricks DavidC?
Which version of objective truth seeker are we going with here? Yours or the the rest of the real world's? He deals in facts. He understands the science behind the issues he discusses. When he gets something wrong he admits it. I have seen him get corrected and change his viewpoint. He treats other people with respect. That's five points up on you. Assuming you think that you are an objective truth seeker (isn't that a laugh!) then if the option is do I think he is like you? No. He is the complete polar opposite of you. He is somebody I would be proud to meet in real life. Is he a "truth seeker" like you (still funny every time I type it)? No. Not at all. He is heads above you in every respect. Is he an objective truth seeker in the way the rest of the world looks at it? Yes. Much more so than you'll ever be. Which is probably why you seem to be so obsessed with him. Kinda creepy by the way.
Most of them yes for the same reasons as above. Of course there is no "Clavius" forum. The forum you refer to is simply linked to by the Clavius website. It is run by somebody completely different and Jay Windley has no moderator or admin privileges there. As a "truth seeker" you would think you would know that. Especially as you've been corrected on it multiple times before.
Now this is definitely a loaded question. What about your behaviour? What about your annoying habit of pissing off nearly everyone you come in contact with? What about your accusations against multiple forums and moderators that they are somehow being influenced to lie about Apollo simply because they do or say something you don't agree with? Don't you think your own actions might have something to do with how you've been treated? Do I think that Bad Astronomy and Clavius are government run disinfo forums? I've seen no evidence of that. Would it matter if they were? Apollo is an issue of FACTS. If someone discusses an issue using FACTS does it matter who they are?
Here's a question for you. Are you an objective truth seeker? Every forum I've seen you on you try to play your "slick tricks". You try to get people to fall for your lame, rigged "credibility" tests. You ask loaded questions. You accuse people of not believing what they post. You constantly refer to viewers who never seem to show up. You consistently avoid discussing facts. You act like a twat and expect to get treated fairly. How do you reconcile all that? I'm sure you'll play your usual trick (there's that word again) and twist around what I say into somehow meaning that I'm not an objective truth seeker or I don't believe what I post, etc. Everybody is onto you though. Nobody fall for your tricks DavidC. Edited by weasel_turbine, Jun 29 2009, 10:27 PM.
|
 |
|
| We Never Went to the Moon · Skeptics | |
6:47 PM Nov 28
