| Viewing Single Post From: Moved:Flipmode Involvement? | |
|---|---|
| r2d2m2 | Jun 29 2009, 02:42 AM |
|
I see this post has been moved and I have been categorised as a skeptic. Why? Because I don't believe in jumping to conclusions, grasping at straws or twisting the facts? As if my objective is to support the "official story". What I am interested in is the truth, which is the reason I object to false information whatever the source. I object to false information from Bush. I object to false information from Dylan Avery. I object to false information full stop (period). And I have not come here to undermine Dylan's credibility either. He has made a grand job of that himself. I for one had taken his word as bond (hook, line and sinker) until I found out it was not entirely reliable. If that makes me a skeptic then perhaps you could do with a few more like me. Blind believers are not much help in a situation like this. So may I suggest a new category for myself and others like me... Still making objective inquiries due to the abundance of false and/or misleading information coming from both sides of the debate. Call it neutral for short if you like. We are not going to prove whodunit with innuendo and misrepresentation. That's for sure. And in the absence of any solid, factual evidence I think we should rule out any FEMA / Flipmode involvement at this stage. It is mass murder we are investigating after all and we don't want to point the finger in the wrong direction do we? Call me what you will though (if you really must). Perhaps there is some kind of practical purpose to this us-and-them labelling system that I am unaware of. |
 |
|
| Moved:Flipmode Involvement? · Skeptics | |
12:33 PM Nov 25
