| Viewing Single Post From: Flight 77 Engines | |
|---|---|
| r2d2m2 | Jun 23 2009, 12:38 AM |
|
Maybe you should call 007. Or maybe you should call a plane spotter. That link I gave you? Just a random plane spotter site I found on google. I decided to take a look myself (to save you the hard research) and as I suspected their database was more than willing to spill the beans... http://www.planespotters.net/Production_List/Boeing/757/24602,N644AA-American-Airlines.php Construction Number: 24602 Line Number: 365 Reg: N644AA Aircraft Type: Boeing 757-223 Airline: American Airlines Engines: 2x RR RB211-535E4B SELCAL: LP-GQ First Flight: 25-04-1991 Delivered: 08-05-1991 Airframe Status: Written Off Airframe Remark: 11.9.01 Washington DC 64(i)+125 crashed deliberately into Pentagon by terrorists after hijacking That pretty much settles it then. No Pratt & Whitneys on flight 77. No secret. Flight 77 had two RB211 535s pretty much identical to those fitted to the rest of the 757s in American Airlines' fleet (to this date). And if you think this is misinformation then please feel free to double check with some different plane spotters. Just hope I haven't started a wildfire.
Yet in the video you talk about them as if you do. You use your very limited (and flawed) knowledge as evidence. And in doing so you make yourself look pretty silly (or worse in some minds). Excusing the mistake won't really fix it either. We forgive your mistake. Now what are the chances of you putting it right? Choose between your ego and the truth. Choose well.
Boeing 757s have two Pratt & Whitney engines weighing six tonnes each? This was the only information available at the time? Come on! There was plenty of information available on this score. My Rolls Royce publication (from 1992) is one example. Plane spotter sites are another. And I doubt very much that American Airlines have only recently started letting on what engines they use. How the hell would you keep that secret? If you think these lack of information excuses stick then you are kidding yourself. Dylan has jumped to conclusions and used them as evidence of murder. When are you going to stop digging your heels in? Ego versus truth. A man is not a man until he can admit that he is wrong. And besides... if you don't admit mistakes and put them straight your enemies will use them against you. Rest assured.
Bad mistake treating me as a troll (or agent). Now my patience wears thin.
I will talk to you about this another time. All I'll say for now is... Don't hold your breath!
See this is what I'm talking about. You are virtually accusing me of lieing based purely on one word that doesn't sound right to you. Your spidey senses are racked off mate (as us foreigners say). I am going to post a photo in the next few days that will make you wish you had never come out with this silly comment. All you are doing is winding me up. You need to sort out that thin patience of yours.
"F**k the luck s**t, strictly aim" - Notorious B.I.G. First shot... planespotters.net says 535E4B (one shot one kill). Maybe I should spend another ten minutes double checking this top secret information.
Let me rephrase... In relation to flight 77 Loose Change 9/11 states that "the official explaination is that the intense heat from the jet fuel vaporized the entire plane." Can you please tell me where (exactly) this information came from? If it was the 9/11 Commision Report (the only official explaination I know of) then can you please give a page number at least? |
 |
|
| Flight 77 Engines · American Flight 77 | |
10:21 PM Nov 25
