- JFK
-
August 18, 2005 is what I was getting at.
When the info was being compiled/researched before any FOIA's were available, and before Loose Change second edition was created.
Do you have any clue as to how difficult it was to obtain any info then compared to today ?
- r2d2m2
-
This is a pretty febble excuse. You don't need an FOIA to find out what engines an airliner has. If the worst comes to the worst a pair of binoculars will do the trick. It's not exactly top secret information. Check out planespotters.net to see what I mean (you must wear an anorak to post in the forums but it is bloody useful to say the least).
Actually it is a "secret". If it wasn't, the records for all 4 aircraft involved that day would have been spread like wildfire by now. Remember that at that time none of us ( with the exception of "tocarm" ) really knew very much about aircraft components.
- r2d2m2
-
As for the fact that Loose Change 2nd Edition was compiled/researched before it was created... I should hope so too. But what exactly does this prove? You are losing me again. 2nd Edition is the video I watched. My whole point is that Dylan didn't research certain statements in that video carefully enough beforehand.
Dylan did an excellent job of researching with the information available at the time, and both the first two Loose Change videos succeeded in doing exactly what they were intended to do... Get ordinary people to question what they were told and help with the ongoing research.
- r2d2m2
-
I must say that I find this response most disappointing. Being defensive really doesn't help. In fact it gives the impression of a clash between the truth and the ego.
After years of dealing with trolls and agents patience wears thin.
- r2d2m2
-
I am not interested in how this error came about or how understandable it may (or may not) be. As far as I'm concerned someone has a crossed wire and my only interest is uncrossing it. The result of this crossed wire is a bad thing (imho), which is exactly why I want to uncross it, but I am not saying that any individual is bad.
That's great. I await those parts breakdowns. Would you like AA77's tail number to help your search ?
- r2d2m2
-
I know more than Dylan about gas turbines and so I set him straight.
See previous comment.
- r2d2m2
-
Dylan is better looking than me and so he gets the girls. I am not a threat. I have the utmost respect for Dylan and overall I praise his work. He is the hero. Competition over.
Now you are trolling.
- JFK
-
As far as the rest of your questions, the search engine there is very good, better than here even.
Perhaps you should try it.
- r2d2m2
-
What questions?
The questions you asked in the above posts.
- JFK
-
Edit to add - since you "make" rolls royce engines, perhaps you could post some confirmed parts breakdowns for the RB-211E.
- r2d2m2
-
Why do you quote "make"? You use a different word? Should I have said I mek Rolls Royce engines?
I quote "make" because that is what you stated in your opening post. A real person in that occupation would use the terms "build", "assemble", or "manufacture", I have never heard a professional use the term "make" in that context.
- r2d2m2
-
And what do you mean by RB211E? Do you mean RB211 535E4B (as currently fitted to American Airlines 757s) and if so may I suggest that first of all we find out the exact version they were using in 2001 (if possible)?
Good luck with that.
- r2d2m2
-
I also want to find out exactly what the 911 Commision had to say before proceeding myself. I have heard about their claim that the entire plane was vaporized by jet fuel but I would like to see it in black and white. I don't trust these conspiracy videos. They make half of it up as they go along. 
Here you go.
Spoiler: click to toggle
Edited by JFK, Jun 22 2009, 10:15 AM. | 
6:06 AM Dec 3
