| Viewing Single Post From: Question for CIT regarding Edward Paik | |
|---|---|
| Craig Ranke CIT | Jan 26 2008, 12:56 PM |
|
Your "interpretation" ignores what he says, what he drew, and the fact that the Sheraton wasn't hit. Edward was very clear about the angle of approach and this is corroborated by Jamal, Cindy, Mrs. Hubbard, Veronica, and Donald Symmes. ![]() ![]() None of those people could have seen the plane on your flight path and it would have exploded over Edward's head after slamming into the Sheraton. Your desperate "interpretation" to try and force the official story to work despite the mountain of evidence we have proving it false falls completely flat bile. You are in denial. Edited by Craig Ranke CIT, Jan 26 2008, 01:00 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Question for CIT regarding Edward Paik · Pentagon | |






8:40 PM Nov 28