Viewing Single Post From: Question for CIT regarding Edward Paik

Viewing Single Post From: Question for CIT regarding Edward Paik
Craig Ranke CIT	Jan 26 2008, 12:53 PM
Posts: 1,459 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08	bileduct Jan 26 2008, 11:25 AM Aldo Marquis CIT Jan 26 2008, 10:49 AM Ahem... http://thepentacon.com/LloydEngland_AccompliceVideo.htm#UsaToday Mike Walter said a lot of things. I think you are going to to learn a lot about Mike Walter. Why don't you start there, Bile. CLASSIC! One CIT member uses Mike Walter to support a banking maneuver that would suggest a north side flyover (except his testimony suggests the plane banks in the wrong direction), and when refuted, another CIT member swoops in with CIT "evidence" that Mike has problems telling the truth! Absolutely phenomenal, guys! Mike Walter's account doesn't make sense on many levels. I never said I believed him. But for some reason he felt the need to throw that "graceful bank" into his story. Was he trying to blend his fabricated account with what the plane really did? Make your own determination but a bank in his view AT ALL completely destroys the official story.
Posts: 1,459 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08

Question for CIT regarding Edward Paik · Pentagon