Viewing Single Post From: thank you "jref"

Viewing Single Post From: thank you "jref"
Stundie	Jan 25 2008, 07:44 PM
Posts: 890 Group: Members Member #78 Joined: 01/16/08	nicepants Of course it is. Pdoh registered a sock when he was suspended. That sock got banned...later that same day you registered with an IP 40 miles from Pdoherty's. Your opinion is not backed up and you are dabbling in the art of pseudoskepticism. You said earlier, that the evidence that I used which shows that my IP is 40 miles away from pdoherty, so I can't be Pdoherty proves nothing. Yet you are NOW using it as evidence to show that the JREF Forum used this info to ban me as a sock. So you are guilty of using the double standards in the application of criticism as outlined by Truzzi. Its NOT OK for me to use the IP evidence to prove I'm not Pdoherty, but it's OK to use it as evidence, to prove that a JREF Mod thought I was a sock. So lets apply some critical thinking skills as opposed to your pseudoskepticism which is running throughout this thread. So if we both use the IP evidence, then it's easy to establish (And using Occams...I know you JREFers love that one!) that my IP is not the same as Pdohertys and the JREF forum banned me, even though it's different. Therefore I am not him. The only other evidence you have to support your claims is that the JREF Groupthink suspected I was Pdoherty and the evidence all suggests I'm not him, but they banned me anyway because they forgot the rules of innocent until proven guilty. So you are wrong. Regardless of how you spin it!! You have no evidence for your claims and you are playing nothing more than apologetics for the JREF Forum mods, its quite sweet that you feel the need to defend their honour so vigorously! nicepants You created an account the same day he created a sock, not the same day that pdoherty76 was registered. Sorry I made the mistake of not saying that "Pdoherty registered one of his socks on the same day!" instead of "Pdoherty registered on the same day!"?? What a piss poor argument, I'm sorry I confused you and I forgot to mention a sock. However the point still stands. nicepants False claim....AGAIN. You did not join the same day pdoherty76 did. Read for comprehension: More proof of your love of semantics. hahahahahahahahaha!!! See above! Sorry I should have said "sock!" Sorry I confused you....lol nicepants The JREF forum is not a court of law. It is a private message board. Please refer to the JREF membership agreement. There is no kidding you Sherlock!! I honestly thought I could fool you into thinking that JREF was a court of law, but there is no fooling you Nicepants! Your switched right on. lol As for the JREF Membership, I didn't break any rules to my knowledge (As proven! I'm not Pdoh or a sock!) and I contacted the JREF Admin (As proven in my 1st few mails at the SLC forum). But my ban still stays even though the mods know I am not him (As proven with emails from Orphia Nay, Olivier and a thread at the JREF Forum about my banning at the JREF Forum.) Keep defending the your god gravy and the JREFers Nicepants and make out I'm the bad guy who did everything wrong, it's what groupthink expects of you and you are not disappointing. nicepants Proving your identity is not proving a negative. No it is not, but I do not need to prove to you or anyone else who I am. You are asking me to prove who I am in order to prove I am not Pdoherty (Or 1 of his socks!) when you or anyone else has no proof I'm Pdoherty in the 1st place. So why do I have to prove to you....or anyone else who I am?? Are you worried I could be a NWO agent?? hahahahahahaha!!!
Posts: 890 Group: Members Member #78 Joined: 01/16/08

thank you "jref" · Skeptics