Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Viewing Single Post From: Pentagon Reservation has Ballistic Missile Defense appropriations
22205
Member Avatar
Arlingtonian


sorry to play "duhbunker" here JackD, but:

Posted Image


Posted Image



general search:
http://www.google.com/search?q=0901585C&hl=en&sa=2



key result:
http://tinyurl.com/p693r6 (cached html)

or original pdf:
http://www.dtic.mil/descriptivesum/Y2010/MDA/0901585C.pdf

Quote:
 
Missile Defense Agency (MDA) Exhibit R-2 RDT&E Item Justification
Date May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E, DW/06 RDT&E Management Support
R-1 NOMENCLATURE
0901585C Pentagon Reservation
Project: ZX42 Pentagon Reservation Maintenance Reserve Fund (PRMRF)
MDA R2 (0901585C)
Pentagon Reservation Maintenance Reserve Fund (PRMRF)


A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification

This DoD directed Program Element started in FY01 to separately identify costs for the Pentagon Reservation Maintenance Reserve Fund (PRMRF). The PRMRF finances the following: real property operation and maintenance costs of the Pentagon and Federal Office Building Two, Pentagon reservation security, and associated parking areas.


Accomplishments/Planned Program

This effort provides funding for real property operation costs to include maintenance and facility support costs associated with the Missile Defense Agency occupying Federal Office Building Two.


if you look at how much money was appropriated, its clear that its not enough money for a "missile response system". so i think the above description/explantion of where the funds went/go, sounds legit.


secondly, i have personal word from a local (airforce) person intimately familiar with the place and procedures in question, and according to him the only air defenses around the pentagon are mobile. in other words there are no missile silos or automatic/built-in missile batteries. when there is a "situation" like 9/11, "scuds" (direct quote from my source) whose launchers are built into or onto the back of trucks are driven in and then placed at the scene.

you have to keep in mind how close to the airport the pentagon is, and how - if there was an automatic system set up - it could shoot down a passenger plane by mistake or accident. dozens of planes fly around or almost over that building all day everyday, so i think an automatic friend/foe shootdown system would be very risky, to the point of making it unfeasible, even after 9/11.



with regard to Honnegar, either she is misinformed (i.e. she has not updated her knowledge base) or she is controlled opposition. i dont know if any attempts have officially been made to make her privy to cit's interviews or to the implications of the northside, or if she knows of the complete absence of any evidence for a missile attack. but if she knows of this new (cit) evidence and is still pushing missile theories, then she is suspect (imo). if she doesnt know, then she has no business expressing any "expert" thoughts on the matter. if she claims to be or poses as someone who is knowledgeable on the "pentagon attack" then she is 100% responsible to keep in touch with updated information on the subject. we are at exactly a year since the ANC witnesses were interviewed and those interviews made public, so i dont think its an unreasonable to expect her to know whats new and whats up. but since i dont track her or her "theories", i have no idea where she currently stands, that is - if she stands anywhere at all, for i dont know of or havent heard of any recent activity from her.

there was no missile there on 9/11: there is not one eyewitness to substantiate its existence. not one.

Offline Profile Quote Post
Pentagon Reservation has Ballistic Missile Defense appropriations · Pentagon