Viewing Single Post From: thank you "jref"

Viewing Single Post From: thank you "jref"
Stundie	Jan 25 2008, 02:41 PM
Posts: 890 Group: Members Member #78 Joined: 01/16/08	nicepants They are not my claims, they are the claims of the admins. It is not my job to support THEIR claims. No it's your job to support their claims if you believe them nicepants. You obviously believe them, so you need to be able to support their claims otherwise you are making more unsubstantiated claims. Your failure to do this just highlights what a coward you are. If you cannot support their claims, then you have no basis for your opinion that the JREF Forum were right to ban me. Its quite simple Mr Psuedoskeptic!! nicepants I could remotely use an IP that's 150 miles away from me and claim that I'm someone else, it proves nothing. This just highlights how stupid your arguments are and how the double standard in the application of critisism works in the case of a psuedoskeptic like yourself. So if this proves nothing, and I can't use it as an argument to prove that I am not Pdoherty as I'm 40 miles away, then the JREF Mods cannot use this as an excuse as to why they banned me if it proves nothing. In other words, you are highlighting your psuedoskeptical skills by saying that the JREF Mods used this information to prove I was a sock, but I can't use this as evidence to prove that I am not Pdoherty. As it's proves nothing according to you. So the only shambolic piece of evidence you have left is that they banned me based on the suspicision of the JREF Groupthinkers as I always suspected. No doubt as I have shown, to save Gravy from being embarressed!! nicepants Read for comprehension. You did not register the same day as pdoherty. You registered the day that he was banned, after he was already caught trying to register another sock. You did say this in an earlier post didn't you..... nicepants 11/21/2006 - Pdoherty76 was suspended on for multiple breaches of his membership agreement. 11/21/2006 - Pdoherty76 registers another user account in an attempt to circumvent his suspension, resulting in the immediate ban of both accounts. 11/21/2006 - Stundie registers an account on the JREF forums. So for the record it is your reading comprehension which needs to be reviewed. Again more pseudosketpical skills you are demonstrating.....lol nicepants Wrong, again. Please read my posts before responding to them. (See previous response) See psuedosketpical tactics in my signature and check out the ones you are using. nicepants I never claimed I have proof. I posted the evidence I gathered. You gathered evidence, but it doesn't fit your conclusion. So instead of looking at all the evidence, you decide to ignore my evidence and still stick with the same conclusion, even though you have just shot down your own evidence that the JREF thought I had a similar IP. Everyone who reads this for themselves how much of an intellectual coward you are and the denial which you carry by the bucketload. nicepant As for how you can prove your claim...proof of your identity would be a start. Here is how it works nicepants. If you or JREFers claim that I am Pdoherty, then it is upto you to PROVIDE THE EVIDENCE! You have failed to do so. You cannot then ask me to prove to you that I am not Pdoherty, considering you have no evidence in the 1st place. Do not ask me to prove a negative, because thats not how western societies work, it's called innocent until proven guilty. So unless you have proven that I am pdoherty, (Which you haven't and evidence suggests I am not!) then I am still innocent. Do you understand this or are you intentionally playing the role of a pseudoskeptic??
Posts: 890 Group: Members Member #78 Joined: 01/16/08

thank you "jref" · Skeptics