Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Viewing Single Post From: Boarding Flight 93.....
no family

Quote:
 
Lin. Admins should not allow someone to use the name "victim's family" if they are indeed not family members of a 9/11 victim.

That is very dishonest. We would be crucified by the skeptics if we did such a thing.


Dishonest? I never claimed that I was a family member of a 9/11 victim. In fact, when asked if I was, I immediately said, "not that I know of." And that is my honest answer.

Quote:
 
"it is absolutely disgusting to give the impression of being a victim's family member simply to attempt to give credibility to your argument. It is indicative of many things..."


You're right. It is disgusting. It's a good thing that that's not what my motive was for choosing that name. Otherwise, I could easily have made up some story to make it seem as if I was a family member of a 9/11 victim. I didnt do that, but it would have been very easy to do so.

A PM could have been made to the admins if somebody had an issue with my name. And then an admin could have PMed me about changing my name. Or, look-up could have started a new thread about my name. But instead, this thread runs off topic.

So, in an attempt to bring the topic back on track I will repeat my statements about the Clayton White excerpt.


The stewardess that told him it was flight 93 two weeks later could have been mistaken.

If the passengers were boarded in such a strange and suspicious manner (and is it so strange and suspicious? Im not even sure), why do it in front of so many eyewitnesses, out in the open?

You say it is a conflict about how the plane was boarded. What is the opposing report that conflicts with this one?



Edited by no family, Jan 24 2008, 02:41 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post
Boarding Flight 93..... · United Flight 93