| Viewing Single Post From: thank you "jref" | |
|---|---|
| NK-44 | Jan 23 2008, 10:56 PM |
|
So he was banned for being a sock puppet. The question is not what he was being banned for, but if the reason he was being banned for holds water. Unless you can prove that he was a sock of Pdoherty, your 'debunking' is completely irrelevant. Worthless. Needless. Fantasy. Any other evidence besides your fantastic imagination? |
![]() |
|
| thank you "jref" · Skeptics | |




8:09 PM Nov 28