Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Viewing Single Post From: Shanksville 757 challenge for duhbunkers
Domenick DiMaggio

Mick
May 21 2009, 11:58 AM
So can we agree that all of the quotes from the non-expert civilian personnel about the condition of the crash site have little or no value about whether or not an airliner crashed there? Or are there any quotes in that video you think are worthy of being evidence to support any conclusion?

no we cant.

when people arrive to a plane crash they know it. they dont break up into groups to go into the woods to try to find the massive 757.

you don't have to be an aviation crash investigating authoritive to recognize a plane crash. never in all of history have people showed up to a plane crash site and asked "what happened here?" or "wheres the plane?"

people aren't stupid. they dont have to spend years taking courses and classes to be able to recognize a crashed 757.

Quote:
 
If 90% of 100 tons is recovered, then 90 tons is what to expect. But it would be foolhardy to expect it to be piled into one location at the crash site for a photo op.


correct. but i do expect to see it all together inside a hangar somewhere. it all had to go somewhere.

Quote:
 
I also did not see any government statements in the video about any percentage recovered, just some quotes from the news, which we all know can be unreliable.


ok the media is unreliable but the government isn't?

Quote:
 
I have read claims of planes vaporizing before, but never from any knowledgeable source. They seem to be nonsense to me. I have not seen any evidence to show anything besides the liquid components of the plane or cargo vaporized.


well we agree there.

can we agree that when something impacts the ground and creates a crater that craters depth tells us the deepest penetration achieved by the impacting object?
Offline Profile Quote Post
Shanksville 757 challenge for duhbunkers · Skeptics