asaf-a

 

"I am not a debunker, i'm not asking what is NOT true, i am asking you what by your opinion IS true.

If everything you said is true, so the commission report is false, but it dosen't say that the conspiracy is true.

it's an evidence, it's not a conclusion.

Use evidence if it leads to somewhere, not if it is just weird or opposite of the original story.

I only asked for what you assume to have happend based on your evidence, i didn't ask for just the evidence itself.

Not i gotta say that many times you are bringing evidence which is true, but dosen't point anywhere.

The point is that if you bring evidence of something that contradicts the offical story- does it automaticly means it is a conspiracy?

But i guess i understand your point about a new investigation.

I just think that doubting the offical story is not enough to immediatly jump to conclusions.

I challenge you to use your evidence to reach a chain of event that will have less holes then the official version.

Why are you so upset about it?

just tell me what happend and that's it. "