| Viewing Single Post From: This forum | |
|---|---|
| mik | May 2 2009, 10:46 AM |
|
Right, I think I might be starting to understand how this public accusation came about. You do have a lightpole theory, but it is not witness/fact based. In the absence of meaningful evidence, there is nothing wrong with theorising, in fact I'd like to see more of it. You wanted more than a theory, you wanted to prove it, or at least find some meaningful evidence that would support it, fair enough. The problem for Lloyd England, is that your theory, which is not witness/fact based, seems to require his complicity. Some, including me, would now think really hard about how plausible the involvement of Lloyd England was, perhaps you did. So you went back to Lloyd, and recorded an old man trying to remember what occured some years ago. So desperate were you to validate your theory, that you took the confused and ambiguous rambling of this old man, and twisted it into your theory. He is just an old man who got caught up in your theorising. I suspect that you genuinely believe that your video is a confession, or virtual confession as you call it, and that Lloyd is complicit. However, I think you are in serious error, and that you have made a public accusation based on nothing more than your theory, in other words, your imagination. Edited by mik, May 2 2009, 10:51 AM.
|
 |
|
| This forum · Skeptics | |
10:54 PM Dec 7
