Viewing Single Post From: Another hard question

Viewing Single Post From: Another hard question
asaf-a	May 1 2009, 11:36 AM
Posts: 40 Group: Members Member #1,103 Joined: 03/27/09	Miragememories May 1 2009, 09:13 AM asaf-a "Hi. After failing to just put it out in a simple chain of event, i'll ask you another question about the conspiracy. The theory is already out, and it can be used against America and espically the Bush administration by many many people. Bush could have been put to blame by Chavez, by Iran, by Iraqis, by Bush haters, by Al-Qaeda, Taliban, Democrats and Osama Bin-Laden himself. Yet the only people who seem to drop those charges are you guys. And more, the theories didn't start quickly in 2001, it started few years later. If the collapse of the WTC and the plane in Shanksville and the Pentagon strike was so suspecious, why engineers and air crash investigators didn't speak, instead it came from a group of 23 year old guys making a movie about 9/11 (Loose Change). But that leads me to my hard question: Why would Barack Obama, now as president, keep the secret about 9/11?" What proof do you have that "theories" first occurred a few years after 9/11? I've read a many case histories where serious doubt about the developing 9/11 official story was strong from the very beginning! I'm still looking for your hard question? Who do you believe was going to report any 9/11 accusations that might have been made by " Chavez, by Iran, by Iraqis, by Bush haters, by Al-Qaeda, Taliban, Democrats and Osama Bin-Laden himself." ?? Certainly not the MEDIA. Again the question of "why engineers and air crash investigators didn't speak"? They have spoken. The MEDIA, controlled by the same sort of people who created the current economic crisis, have been instructed to "stand down" when it comes to serious investigative journalism about 9/11. Unless you look to the internet, everything about 9/11 has been explained to the satisfaction of the MEDIA CEOs. Barack Obama appears to be on record as wishing to look forward while ignoring the sins of the past. Hopefully, he'll change his mind in response to a public backlash. MM Ok, there were theories close to the actual date of the attack, i didn't know that and this is acceptable. But i mentiond a list which can be way bigger of people with intrests to reveal the conspiracy, they are not part of the US media which i belive you can agree is the only media the conspirators can control, so how come we havn't heard such acusations from anti-american media? Why havn't we heard this acusations from Cuban media or North Korean media or Irani media. I mean c'mon, Iran has done anything (even deny the holocaust) and still even they don't accuse America of 9/11 fraud. Chavez has called Bush a satan, he has no intrest in sparing him from "compliments". And Osama Bin-Laden, well, you could debate the issue of did 9/11 do good for him and his organization, but i belive that if i was accused of bringing down the twin-towers and i was innocent, i would have said i'm not guilty, yet he admits it (in many tapes, not just the one that is on Loose Change) Barack Obama has no intrest in supporting Bush, actully during the elections he could have used the conspiracy theory against McCain as a Bush supporter so he has an intrest to reveal any type of shit on Bush, like he does now with the torture. So do you tell me Obama is willing to reveal dirt on Bush like turtore that was done in the CIA, but he would spare him from the 9/11 fraud? It dosen't make any sense.
Posts: 40 Group: Members Member #1,103 Joined: 03/27/09

Another hard question · Skeptics