Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Viewing Single Post From: This forum
Craig Ranke CIT
Member Avatar

mik
Apr 28 2009, 03:54 PM
Also, by entering into a debate, members/moderators own debating skills can develop. It is easy to be sarcastic, dismissive. It is easy to restrict and ban. It is difficult to be challenged.
You aren't getting it.

This forum does not exist for debate and it isn't their responsibility to provide an environment for an endless argument over any single piece of evidence.

Productive discussion and research is encouraged, but semantic circles and opinionated personal attacks against information that exposes the operation are not tolerated.

Yes it is biased.

That's how it SHOULD be given the issue and given the serious psychological handicap that we have as we go against the entire mainstream media and the world-wide propaganda machine of the military-industrial-complex.

You can disagree with things all you want but if you really and truly believe that 9/11 was an inside job you will focus on activism and use the information that you personally deem the strongest in order to do so if you want to contribute productively.

Your opinion on Lloyde England has been noted and your personal attack on me in doing so was dealt with appropriately.

Perhaps you should make a list here in the "skeptics" forum of all the things that you think skeptics should focus on during this information war in order to expose the operation.

I look forward to seeing your productive contribution to this positive effort.

Offline Profile Quote Post
This forum · Skeptics