|
- Posts:
- 160
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #16
- Joined:
- 01/14/08
|
The living pilots
How was the identity of the alleged hijackers uncovered? This was explained under oath during a hearing of the 9/11 commission by Robert Bonner, the head of Customs and Border Protection:
- Quote:
-
BONNER: On the morning of 9/11, through an evaluation of data -- by the way, this was the passing through manifest, which U.S. Customs was able to access from the airlines -- I would say, within about an hour of 9/11 U.S. Customs Office of Intelligence had identified the 19 probable hijackers as well as the complete list of the passengers on the aircraft. MR. BEN-VENISTE: Let me ask you briefly about your statement about the day on 9/11 which I found very interesting. You say that, on the morning of 9/11, through an evaluation of data related to the passenger manifest of the four terrorist hijacked aircraft, Customs Office of Intelligence was able to identify the likely terrorist hijackers within 45 minutes of the attack, Customs forwarded the passenger lists with the names of the victims and 19 probable hijackers to the FBI and the intelligence community. How are your people able to do that? BONNER (...) by 11:00 a.m., I'd seen a sheet that essentially identified the 19 probable hijackers. And in fact, they turned out(...) to be the 19. Commission Hearing
Keep this, which was also confirmed by Richard Clarke, in mind, when it comes to the 'living pilots'. Why were they suspected when they have never been on the passenger manifests? What reasons had the FBI to believe that the possible hijackers didn't necessarily occur on the passenger manifests? And we will also see that left rented cars played an important role in (mis-)identifying the hijackers.
One of the first suspects was Lotfi Raissi, an Algerian pilot living in Britain.
- Quote:
-
U.S. authorities began extradition proceedings in a London court Friday against a British-based Algerian pilot suspected of being the flight instructor for four of the 19 hijackers who attacked U.S. landmarks Sept. 11. Investigators consider the arrest a breakthrough in the search for living co-conspirators to the New York and Pentagon attacks. "We believe he is by far the biggest find we have had so far. He is of crucial importance to us," an FBI source told the Times of London. "What we say is that he was in fact a lead instructor for four of the pilots responsible for the hijackings," said the prosecutor, Arvinda Sambir. "He was in the background to facilitate training of these pilots. His job was to ensure the pilots were capable and trained." Source
- Quote:
-
Today, Raissi is being held in London on a U.S. extradition warrant, accused of training Hanjour and three other hijackers. British prosecutors have said that Raissi and Hanjour attended the same flight schools and that a computer seized in Raissi's apartment in England contained a video clip of the two men. During the past two summers, they were together at the Sawyer simulator, according to various employees who worked there after Fults had left. Source
- Quote:
-
One example, this man, Lotfi Raissi, entered the U.S. to begin flight training in 1996. He became a flight instructor. He's now being held in Britain. U.S. and British officials say Raissi made several trips between the U.S. and the U.K. He even flew with suspected hijacker pilot Hani Hanjour from Las Vegas to Phoenix on June 23 to oversee the flight simulator training of Hanjour and three other alleged hijack pilots. Source
- Quote:
-
A British prosecutor, representing the US government, said: "We have sufficient evidence to show not just association with the pilots - it goes further than that. We have evidence of active conspiracy-proving correspondence and telecommunications with them as well as video footage of them together. We also have proof that they travelled together." (Source)
He was arrested in Britain,. and later, in April 2002:
- Quote:
-
It turned out, the British court found, that the video showed Raissi with his cousin, not Mr. Hanjour, that Raissi had mistakenly filled in his air training logbook and had never flown with Hanjour, and that Raissi and the hijackers were not in Las Vegas at the same time. The US authorities never presented any phone records showing conversations between Raissi and Hanjour. Source
As U.S. athorities provided their evidence, it turned out that they have none! Maybe this is the reason why they refused to deliver evidence in the trials against Mzoudi and Motassadeq? Notice also this telling statement from the same article:
- Quote:
-
Indeed, the difficulties of tracking down suspects and amassing sufficient evidence to convict them leads some experts to wonder whether it is worth it. "Is terrorism a crime or is it war?" asks Stephen Gale, a counterterrorism expert who teaches at the University of Pennsylvania. "If you think someone is going to take out your electrical grid, in a criminal investigation you arrest him. In a war you shoot first and ask questions later," he points out.
Think of it! If they had shot Riassi first, there wouldn't have been a trial. So the U.S. wouldn't have been forced to deliver evidence. So the evidence wouldn't have turned out to be non-existant. So the official version would be until today: Raissi was a lead instructor of the hijackers... See also
The story of another suspect related to Hanjour became almost forgotten. Faisal M. Al Salmi was indicted for giving false statements to the FBI about his association with Hanjour. Al Salmi hired in April 20001 for a remedial flying course in Tempe, Arizona at Sunbird Aviation One day Al Salmi appeared with a second man who later turned out to be of interest to the FBI. Asked about this second man, Oscar Casdorph said that he did not recognize Hanjour from FBI pictures and does not know whether the second man had a connection to any of the hijackers.
Casdorph said he only knew the second man's first name, but would not disclose it, at the FBI's request. Source
This means that it was most likely not Hanjour, as the FBI would have no reason to not diclose his name. Unfortunately, we could not ask Casdorph for revealing the name as he is already dead. There's one thing Hanjour, Al Salmi and the unknown 'second man' have in common: their flying skills. Casdorph mentioned the "poor flying skills" of Al Salmi and that "he did not feel comfortable flying with the second man and did not return calls when the man sought additional lessons."
Al Salmi denied any connections to Hanjour, and therefore was convicted and found guilty of making false statements in denying knowledge of Hanjour. Source
He was not convicted for participation in the 9/11-plot, because "he took a polygraph test that shows he was not involved in the Sept. 11 attacks." Source
There were also others suspected to be hijackers, like Adnan and Ameer Bukhari, both Saudi pilots. They "were believed to have been on of the two flights out of Boston." CNN
But when the FBI raided Adnan Bukhari’s house it turned out that he was alive. And that Ameer Bukhari " had died in an air collision above the St. Lucie County International Airport exactly a year before the attacks”. CNN
But the Bukhari's (who were misreported as brothers) were not on the passenger manifests, so how did they became suspect within hours after the attacks? Here's the answer:
- Quote:
-
“Law enforcement sources also tell CNN that the Bukhari brothers were believed to have been on of the two flights out of Boston, one of those two flights that wound up slamming into the World Trade Center. Also we can report to you that a car impounded in Portland, Maine, according to law enforcement authorities, was rented at Boston Logan Airport and driven to Portland, Maine.” (CNN, 9/12/01 3:00 p. m.)
- Quote:
-
" Evidence found in a rental car left in Portland, Maine, led investigators to two houses in Vero Beach, Florida. One had been rented by two brothers from Saudi Arabia." CNN
- Quote:
-
Federal sources had initially identified the brothers as possible hijackers who had boarded one of the planes that originated in Boston. Their names had been tied to a car founded at an airport in Portland, Maine. But Bukhari's attorney said it appeared their identifications were stolen and said Bukhari had no role in the hijackings. Information found in another rental car left in Boston's Logan Airport -- where two of the hijacked flights originated -- led investigators to two more men who were pilots: Mohammed Atta and Marwan Yousef Alshehhii. CNN
- Quote:
-
"U.S. authorities found this letter handwritten in Arabic in the suitcase of Mohamed Atta. It includes Islamic prayers, instructions for a last night of life, and a practical checklist of reminders for the final operation. The FBI released an untranslated copy of the letter; the British newspaper The Observer published this translation. Additional copies of this letter were found at the crash site of United Airlines Flight 93 in Pennsylvania and at a Dulles International Airport parking lot in a car registered to one of the hijackers on American Flight 77. Source
That's another one, now we have three cars left with evidence at airports. One found at Washington’s Dulles Airport registered to Nawaf Al-Hazmi Source
Another is discovered at Boston’s Logan Airport, registered to Marwan Al-Shehhi Source
And the third, with 'evidence' suggesting the Bukharis as hijackers, is the one found in Portland, Maine. Registered to Mohammed Atta.
- Quote:
-
Before flying from Portland to Boston to carry out terror attacks on New York City, Mohamed Atta and Abdul Alomari rented a car at the Logan Airport Alamo and drove to Maine, police said. Source
- Quote:
-
Meanwhile, another investigator was interviewing a manager of Alamo Rent A Car at the jetport. A search of the company's computer records showed Atta had rented a blue Nissan Altima Sept. 9 in Boston and that it was due back Sept. 11 by 6 p.m. It was listed as overdue. Source
The cars full of evidence were pretty comfortable for the FBI's investigation - directly presented to them on a golden plate. And don't forget the passports found at the WTC and in Shanksville (not to mention the red bandana) and at the Pentagon. And Atta's bags at the airport. An the 'confession-video' of Osama Bin Laden, supposedly found by accident in Jalalabad. And Jarrah's returned love-letter. Or they just left a box cutter together with a credit card here, or together with manuals there.
They left a Koran here and a Koran there. (And btw., it's obvious how 'box-cutter' and 'koran' became signal-words after the attacks, associated to brandmark the traumatized minds of the people with anti-islamism. Beeing a moslem + a boxcutter is all you need to become suspicious and eventual go to prison, think of Ayub Ali Khan)
"Never in the history of modern warfare has so much been found so opportunely." Guradian
Also notice this comment from the same article:
- Quote:
-
Apart from the fact that the al-Qaida network seem to have a catastrophic way with lost property, isn't it strange that these most demonised and potent of terrorists seem unable to operate any weapons without a manual?
- Quote:
-
"The attacks were probably well planned, but they didn't do a good job covering their tracks," one federal agent said. Source
Giving all these 'golden plates', what would Columbo say on that? Don't know, but here's what the Miami Herald said:
- Quote:
-
“In the end, they left a curiously obvious trail—from martial arts manuals, maps, a Koran, Internet and credit card fingerprints. Maybe they were sloppy, maybe they did not care, maybe it was a gesture of contempt of a culture they considered weak and corrupt.” Source
But maybe it's just what it looks like to be: planted evidence. And you don't have to be a Columbo to figure that out:
- Quote:
-
„Many of the investigators believe that some of the initial clues that were uncovered about the terrorists' identities and preparations, such as flight manuals, were meant to be found. A former high-level intelligence official told me, " Whatever trail was left was left deliberately—for the F.B.I. to chase.“ Source
And we've just seen the proof for his statement in the case of the Bukharis. How could it be that the FBI revealed the names of the 19 hijackers five days later and furthermore "through an evaluation of data related to the passenger manifest of the four terrorist hijacked aircraft, Customs Office of Intelligence was able to identify the likely terrorist hijackers within 45 minutes of the attack" , but weeks later it's stated:
- Quote:
-
On Friday (<28. Sept.01>) Robert Mueller, the FBI's director, was forced to release photos of the suspected suicide hijackers and beg citizens to help his agents identify them. One hijacker, he was sure, was linked to the bin Laden network, but he wouldn't give his name. Mueller admitted that he wasn't clear about the identities of many of the rest. Guardian
The article also states:
- Quote:
-
The Germans and others at the Nato meeting on Wednesday were convinced the US would arrive with a bulging dossier on bin Laden's complicity. They got so little that a desperate Lord Robertson was reduced to covering America's back by wondering aloud whether 'it is necessary for an ally to produce evidence?'
My answer would be a simple 'yes, of course'. What would be your's?
Let's go back, there was also another commercial pilot suspected to be a hijacker: Ameer Taiyb Kamfar
- Quote:
-
"Amer Kamfar, also suspected by the FBI of being among the World Trade Center hijackers, had both allegedly trained at the Vero Beach pilot school Flight Safety Academy" Source
- Quote:
-
Thursday night, police in Florida were searching for Kamfar, who was reported to be at large and armed with an AK-47 assault rifle. Source
But he's not listed on the passengers-manifest. Where does his name come from?
Kamfar was linked to the hijacker Alomari:
- Quote:
-
“Kamfar, 41, lived at the same Vero Beach address as Abdulrahman Alomari, who is listed in FAA records as having worked in flight operations for the Saudi airline and who was sitting next to Atta in the business section of American Airlines Flight 11, according to the passenger manifest.” Source
Kamfar was also linked to Adnan Bukhari:
- Quote:
-
Two alleged associates of the hijackers, Adnan Bukhari and Amer Kamfar, attended flight schools in Florida and had the Saudi Arabian Airlines post office box in the Saudi city of Jeddah, listed as their home addresses on their commercial pilots' licenses. Source
And Bukhari has links to Al Omari, too:
- Quote:
-
Bukhari helped Al Omari to rent the house next door. Source
- Quote:
-
“Bukhari lived in one house and Abdul Rahman Alomari, 38, in the other.” (Sun-Sentinel, 9/14/01)
But then:
- Quote:
-
“However, the FBI did say it no longer was looking for Amer Taiyb Kamfar, who lived at the same Vero Beach address as Abdul Rahman Alomari, identified as Abdulaziz Alomari on the list of suspected hijackers. The alert for Kamfar, put out to all law enforcement agencies on Wednesday, had described him as armed and extremely dangerous. FBI spokeswoman Judy Orihuela said she couldn't comment on why the bulletin was rescinded.” (Palm Beach Post, 9/15/01)
Do you see a pattern here? We have four pilots, three of them suspected to be hijacker, one to be the 'lead instructor'. One turned out to be already dead. A second, Raissi, has been convicted with false evidence. And we have Adnan Bukhari and Kamfar, both linked to Al Omari, furthermore they've found links to Bukhari in the car rented by Atta and Al Omari. But their links turned to dust:
- Quote:
-
In the interview with the FBI on September 12 Adnan Bukhari of course didn’t have to prove anymore that he wasn’t aboard an airplane on 911 but he had to answer tough questions about his close friendship to the hijacker Abdul Rahman Al Omari. But he had luck and once again was able to present a convincing proof of his innocence: “Just as the questions began, Bukhari's cell phone rang. It was Alomari. Bukhari turned to his attorney: "You're never going to believe who this is." Bukhari handed the phone to the FBI agent. "I think from that they started to realize I had nothing to do with it and it was just a mistake with the names." (Palm Beach Post, 9/21/01)
This means, we have now FOUR men falsely suspected to be the pilots.
And since then, the hijacker on Atta's side is called Abdulaziz Al-Omari , and not Abdul Rahman Al-Omari. Just a name-confusion it's said here.
But why is it that
- Quote:
-
in the Justice Department list of hijackers released yesterday, Alomari's first name is spelled Abdulaziz. Federal investigators said they could not explain the discrepancy between the American Airlines passenger list and their list. Hijackers may have taken Saudi identities
Furthermore, how could the car have contained evidence linking to Bukhari, when he has only links to the Saudi Airlines Pilot Abdul Rahman Al-Omari and not to Abdulaziz Al-Omari?
And the confusion expands:
- Quote:
-
“Abdul Aziz al-Omari [Photo No. 4] was identified as one of the hijackers and the pilot who crashed American Airlines Flight 11 into the North Tower of the World Trade Center. Another man with the same name is an electrical engineer in Saudi Arabia. He lived in Denver after earning a degree from the University of Colorado in 1993. Coincidence? Consider this oddity. ABC News has reported that his Denver apartment was broken into and his passport and other documents stolen in 1995. In September 2001 he told the Telegraph, ‘I couldn't believe it when the FBI put me on their list. They gave my name and my date of birth, but I am not a suicide bomber. I am here. I am alive. I have no idea how to fly a plane. I had nothing to do with this.’” (Insight the News, 7/7/03)
Sounds like stolen identity. Remember when Bukhari's attorney said "it appeared their identifications were stolen". Do you see a pattern here?
To summarize the mysterious four hijackers (three pilots/ one lead instructor):
-Lofti Raissi: from "biggest breakthrough", "cruical importance" , a "in fact lead instructor" to verdict of not guilty (and who should have better been "shot first")
-Ameer Bukhari: from a hijacker pilot to dead since a year
-Adnan Bukhari: from a hijacker pilot to still alive, then from ties to the hijackers to "helping authorities".
-Ameer Taiyb Kamfar: from a hijacker pilot to still alive, then from 'armed with an AK47' to innocent person.
Edited by NK-44, Jan 23 2008, 11:23 PM.
|