| Viewing Single Post From: UA93: "Transponder On" at 10:05 | |
|---|---|
| Woody Box | Apr 25 2009, 05:11 PM |
|
I'm still in the process of gathering evidence that the radar blip beyond Shanksville which was believed to be Flight 93 by every controller, supervisor, and official, was a real plane and not just an artefact on the Traffic Situation Display. (This TSD theory is promoted by the govt loyalist site, Cheap Shot aka Colin Scoggins, Lynn Spencer etc.). And there is plenty of evidence. But what I found now is so far-reaching, and in the light of Domenick's findings and the shootdown discussion I think it's helpful to make it public right now. It's a transcript within the FAA Command Center, between the National Traffic Management Officer, East Position ("ntmo-e") and Doug Davis of the Operations Center ("doug"). I've highlighted the relevant parts. 1405 (10:05 a.m.) ntmo-e: ok united ninety three we're now receiving a transponder on and he is at eighty two hundred feet doug: now transponder and he's eighty two-hundred ntmo-e: southeastbound still doug: eighty two hundred feet and now getting a transponder on him ntmo-e: correct doug: ok buddy 10:06 ntmo-e: ok we've lost radar contact with united ninety three doug: all right 10:07 ntmo-e: sixteen south of Johnstown where they lost united ninety three and it was heading turning one four zero heading doug: which will put him to what do you think ntmo-e: uh I guess that put him down coming right just west of Dulles doug: ok ntmo-e: if he stays on that heading of course doug: how we doing John with getting stuff on the ground ntmo-e: uuhh we're the're not the're still going to their original destinations if you look at TSD you'll see that the eastern part of the unites states is thinning out doug: ok ntmo-e: uh you know airports like dulles uh new york there we have no aircraft going into there doug: ok 10:08 ntmo-e: ok uh there is now on the on united ninety three doug: yes ntmo-e: there is now a report of black smoke in the last position I gave you fifteen miles of Johnstown doug: from the airplane or from the ground ntmo-e: uhh they're speculating it's from the aircraft doug: ok bud ntmo-e: uhh who hit the ground that's what they're speculation it's speculation only doug: ok 10:10 doug: hey john ntmo-e: yes doug: do we have anything on delta nineteen eighty nine is she still heading to cleveland? ntmo-e: delta nineteen eighty nine was returning to Cleveland and they were no longer treating it like a hijacked aircraft doug: ok ntmo-e: I don't know if he's landed ok; the last position of united I'm going to give some coordinates united ninety three doug: yes ntmo-e: three nine five one north zero seven eight four six west doug: zero seven eight four six ntmo-e: west doug: west doug: all right ntmo-e: you got the thirty nine fifty one north doug: ya thirty nine fifty one north zereo seven eighty four six west ntmo-e: that's the last known position of united ninety three http://www.scribd.com/doc/14141827/NYC-B1-NTMO-East-Position-3-Fdr-Transcript SUMMARY: United 93 switched on the transponder at 10:05 (two minutes after its alleged crash), and the transponder indicated an altitude of 8200 ft. It is heading southeast. One minute later, at 10:06, radar contact with United 93 is lost, at the position 39,51 north, 78,46 west. This point is about 13 miles southeast of the crash site. This is the death of the TSD theory. An extrapolated radar blip (without an underlying plane) is hardly capable of switching the transponder on, is it? There can be no doubt that United 93 did not crash at Shanksville. |
 |
|
| UA93: "Transponder On" at 10:05 · United Flight 93 | |
7:01 AM Dec 2
