| Viewing Single Post From: What caused the fires and broken windows? | |
|---|---|
| Ferric Oxide | Apr 25 2009, 12:56 PM |
|
Frankly, I'm glad you brought this up. I had brought this issue up on a private forum about two years ago, but I could not find footage to absolutely verify the theory, so I did not (and do not) pursue the theory further. The camera in the still from video appears to capture someone breaking the window (if one plays the video). The window disappears inward, and then appears to be tossed out. The camera quickly pans away when the most important evidence is about to be displayed--that is---more video of the windows breaking and being tossed out. These windows are near cubicles which are being set ablaze on the north side of the building. The windows are being broken as the cubicles are being torched. There is also some evidence on Mr. Spak's video which appear to show a window breaking inward. Then after a full second, the window is tossed out. If you look at the floor plan of the building one can clearly see that the inward breaking windows would fall within the office. However, until an FOIA for unedited footage is released, I fear that plausible deniability will deal with this issue adequately. Heat does cause glass to break, but look a little bit more carefully at the Channel 8 footage. I suppose this forum is an adequate forum to present a theory: A team is setting each cubicle ablaze on the north side and breaking the windows as they work their way across the north side. Hypothetically, this action would be yet another way to divert attention away from the more crucial actions going on at the south side of Building seven in the area of the Promenade. Smoke pots and other diversions are common to clandestine operations, at least since the OSS existed. In the times of the OSS, there is an example of one type of diversionary tactic: A smoke pot would be placed near a truck to add plausible deniability to the reason why a supposed gun shot was heard. Those looking in the direction of the gun shot would see the back of a truck smoking and logically attribute the "bang" to that of a back fire, thus dismissing the thought of mischievious behavior surrounding the "bang" sound (for just enough time for the target to be eliminated (actual goal of operation), the perpetrator to get away (actual), and the sponsor to take the blame (sheep dipped subject; either aware or unaware of their involvement depending on the operation) for the event. This is only a hypotheical theory. Edited by Ferric Oxide, Apr 25 2009, 01:18 PM.
|
 |
|
| What caused the fires and broken windows? · WTC 7 | |
4:34 PM Dec 1
