Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Viewing Single Post From: WTC1 75N/77W dust jet emerged before the collapse initiation
BoneZ
Member Avatar

TDX
 
Uff, this is way too ot, but as you wish
Well, had you not ignored my post in the other thread or ignored my PM, we wouldn't be at this point now would we?

TDX
 
The hoboken video is a fraud, you can crealy hear that it is not the qriginal soundtrack
Clearly hear it, huh? Not only can I clearly NOT hear it, I've never heard such a claim except from a few debunkers years ago.

TDX
 
if they were there then we would see large window breakage before the collapse (or very rapid smoke movements) on the North Tower
If you watch the north tower closely in the Hoboken video, you will see the smoke become disturbed just seconds before collapse. If you sync the audio with the video (taking into account the 2 miles of sound travel), there are a couple smaller detonations that disturb the smoke and were the initiators of the collapse in the north tower. Then you hear the series of detonations as the north tower is falling.

TDX
 
we would hear them in other sountracks
Oh guess what? At 2:27 in the video you posted, you hear the SAME series of detonations as the Hoboken video (I've already adjusted the link for the correct time):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qiye0R-65RE#t=2m27s

So, thank you for posting that link. I had actually never seen that particular clip, but it confirms the audio in the Hoboken video to be accurate, and your claim that the audio was faked to be disinfo.

TDX
 
nevertheless the preparators wouldn't risk the sound of explosions on the video tapes
But the sounds of explosions did make it onto video tapes like the Hoboken video, the above YouTube video and several others. Not to mention the fact that that numerous firefighters heard the "boom boom boom" detonations going off, police, Brian Clark (south tower survivor) mentions it in a couple documentaries, etc. The video evidence and the witness testimony is there, you're just throwing it all out the window for your own agenda.

TDX
 
my credibility is high
:D I think I've already shown that it's not, but lets continue anyway...

TDX
 
I know more in regard to the collapses than you
:D This must be another disinfo claim as you have no idea what I know.

TDX
 
you shouldn't bark here
I've been barking on the Loose Change forums for several years, where have you been? You think you can just join up at a forum, spew your BS and think you're all knowing and tell others what they do and don't know? :D You slay me!

I've been researching and studying the collapse of the WTC and controlled demolitions for several years since I was first introduced to 9/11 truth. Although I'm versed in just about everything 9/11, the WTC is my main course of study and research.

See the banner in my sig? I'm a member and a sustaining member there. See the next link?

http://stj911.org/

Yep, member there also. And I don't see your work anywhere on either one of those websites. Please humor us and tell us all why?

TDX
 
and that the hoboken video was a fake
Not only have you not shown any evidence of it's fakery, you actually posted a link CONFIRMING the audio to be accurate. You debunked your own self and didn't even realize it. But you go ahead and keep peddling that the Hoboken video was fake and you'll be labeled a disinfo artist.

TDX
 
explosives by itself didn't produce the dust jets (squibs) either
Yet explosives produce the dust jets in every single controlled demolition:

Posted Image

That fact alone debunks any claim you make. And by making that claim, you've already shown you know next to nothing about controlled demolitions. Further, a "squib" is a miniature explosive device that resembles a tiny stick of dynamite, both in appearance and construction, although with considerably less explosive power.
Offline Profile Quote Post
WTC1 75N/77W dust jet emerged before the collapse initiation · World Trade Center