| Viewing Single Post From: WTC1 75N/77W dust jet emerged before the collapse initiation | |
|---|---|
| TDX | Apr 25 2009, 09:06 AM |
![]()
|
Uff, this is way too ot, but as you wish The hoboken video is a fraud, you can crealy hear that it is not the qriginal soundtrack, there weren't any explosions of the needed magnitude (distance>3km), if they were there then we would see large window breakage before the collapse (or very rapid smoke movements) on the North Tower walls and we would hear them in other sountracks, no such thing there, sorry http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTXFnAIP6A0#t=3m20s (note: I don't agree with the video) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qiye0R-65RE There was no need for explosives before and during the collapse initation, thermite did the job very well, if there were explosion of explosives before the collapse, then we would not observe such a big quantites of thermite in the dust (see my other posts), nevertheless the preparators wouldn't risk the sound of explosions on the video tapes.... my credibility is high, I know more in regard to the collapses than you, that's proven fact, you shouldn't bark here, just because you can't imagine that a CD can have acceleration lower than g and that the hoboken video was a fake back to the topic, the dust jet's (squibs) couldn't be produced by panc. floors, because the first squibs emerged before any floor could fall down onto another, explosives by itself didn't produce the dust jets either, because real squibs lat much shorter and are more violent....... the squibs were an expression of rapidly collapsing core and falling core elements inside the elevator shafts, the timing of the dust jets corresponds with invisible collapse initiation inside the core (about 0,7s before any visible movement on the exterior) thus proving controlled demolition |
![]() |
|
| WTC1 75N/77W dust jet emerged before the collapse initiation · World Trade Center | |





4:51 PM Dec 3