| Viewing Single Post From: "He was up on the bridge" | |
|---|---|
| mik | Apr 24 2009, 08:39 PM |
|
Having listened to Lloyd I cannot place much weight on anything he says. Lloyd seems completely unreliable. If his wife is employed by the FBI, she probably has a low level job, a gardener perhaps. Then again, perhaps she is an assasin or some high level agent, as is Lloyd, and the cab driving and dodering demeanor are just a cover. But I don't think so.
The northside evidence being the witnesses I assume. They are credible, and suggest foul play regarding the light poles, but "proving" is your word not mine. It is quite possible that Lloyd's cab was hit by a light pole which was not struck by a plane. Something happened with those light poles and it involves Lloyd, but you don't know what, and neither do I, and face it, neither does Lloyd.
Why do the witnesses (which I assume is the evidence) imply that the plane did not hit the building? I agree that it implies the plane did not hit the light poles. |
 |
|
| "He was up on the bridge" · Pentagon | |
7:43 AM Nov 29
