Viewing Single Post From: "He was up on the bridge"

Viewing Single Post From: "He was up on the bridge"
Craig Ranke CIT	Apr 24 2009, 07:52 PM
Posts: 1,459 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08	mik Apr 24 2009, 06:39 PM The only thing that Lloyd is clearly wrong about is the location, clearly he is in error. I would not say he was being dishonest, I think he is confused, or just mistaken. Now you are completely contradicting yourself but the entire point of this thread is to highlight the FACT that Lloyde admitted that his neighbor took pictures of the cab and the pole from "up on the bridge". Because of this we know that he was not "in error". Especially since he made that statement without knowing he was being audio recorded only minutes before the cameras started rolling and he would claim the complete opposite. mik I don't think it is clear which piece of the pole damaged Lloyd's car, and as I find Lloyd so unreliable I cannot accept his assurance. I do not understand why it is impossible fot the long piece to have done the damage, and I think it is quite possible that it was the small piece. Neither piece did as you know since you already ADMITTED you accept the north side evidence proving "foul play" regarding the light poles. You are contradicting yourself with every sentence you type which exposes either an inability to follow a logical train of thought or else that you are deliberately and dishonestly shifting your position because you have ulterior motives for joining this forum for the purpose of engaging me in this discussion in the first place. mik Perhaps Lloyd is telling you what he thinks you want to hear, perhaps he is making fun of you, perhaps these thoughts are derived from his interest in David Icke. Surely you don't consider this to be a confession from an insider. Ok got it. You are conspiracy theorizing a way to suggest he did not mean the words that he said in spite of the fact that you have admitted you accept evidence proving the plane did not hit the light poles and the building. That is beyond illogical. I don't think you are this confused. It's becoming more and more clear that you have ulterior motives for joining this forum. mik I don't think Lloyd England who is working class and a career cab driver, is likely to have a wife with a significant role at the FBI. Even if she did, and was involved in the 911 cover up, I think it unlikely she would involve her not very bright husband. Ahh so you are classist too! A misogynistic, racist, elitist, conspiracy theorist. Just brilliant. Please keep posting....it's actually quite amazing peaking into the mind of someone bold enough to make such a revealingly contradictory and nonsensical argument against this definitive evidence. More likely of course, you'll further expose your dishonest intentions for joining this forum and you won't be here much longer.
Posts: 1,459 Group: Members Member #14 Joined: 01/14/08

"He was up on the bridge" · Pentagon