| Viewing Single Post From: "He was up on the bridge" | |
|---|---|
| Craig Ranke CIT | Apr 24 2009, 05:56 PM |
|
The lack of damage to the hood of his car is not only not central to our "thesis", it is completely irrelevant to it. We provide enough evidence that equals proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the plane did not hit the poles or the building. The fact that Lloyde's account is physically impossible is secondary to this. Plus your opinion of Lloyde's mental state is worthless as is your unwarranted personal attack on our motives for obtaining and releasing this evidence. I find it rather amusing how you continue to ignore the fact that Lloyde in essence admitted involvement (with a smile on his face) in a "planned" operation that was for the "people with all the money" and that it was "so big" that he could "do nothing about it". In 3 posts you have exposed yourself as an antagonistic pseudo-skeptic who will ignore all evidence that counters the official conspiracy theory regardless of how blatant, obvious, and supported this evidence is. Edited by Craig Ranke CIT, Apr 24 2009, 06:01 PM.
|
 |
|
| "He was up on the bridge" · Pentagon | |
4:00 AM Dec 8
