| Viewing Single Post From: "He was up on the bridge" | |
|---|---|
| mik | Apr 24 2009, 05:23 PM |
|
I said that there seem to be foul play regarding the light poles, because of those witnesses, not despite them. Lloyd England comes across as an extremely unreliable witness, and not too bright either. He seems confused, not dishonest. His wife apparently works for the FBI, and maybe she does, but what is her position at the FBI? I can't imagine the wife of Lloyd England being of any significance at the FBI. Working in their canteen maybe.
The lack of damage to the hood seems central to your thesis. and you seem convinced that it must be damaged. I don't see why the hood has to be damaged. And frankly, even though Lloyd claims that the large part of the pole was responsible for the damage, I don't think he can be relied on here, Lloyd seems convinced the incident occured some distance from where his cab was, I can't take anything he says too seriously, he just seems too unreliable. Lloyd, bless him, appears to be a dodering old man, and you appear to be seeing what you want to see. Edited by mik, Apr 24 2009, 05:23 PM.
|
 |
|
| "He was up on the bridge" · Pentagon | |
6:36 PM Dec 2
