JFK

Jan 6 2009, 08:09 AM

DoYouEverWonder

Jan 6 2009, 06:19 AM

Domenick DiMaggio

Jan 6 2009, 12:04 AM

Zaphod 36

Dec 29 2008, 07:28 AM

7) said it took off almost vertical

Could it have been a "Vertical Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle"(VTUAV)?
Mcelwain claims she has seen no wings on the plane. Did other witnesses saw any wings on that plane?
Is it possible that this plane was propelled with a rotor, like the Boeing X-50 Dragonfly UAV? Link

Is it possible for a jet-propelled plane to take off almost vertical?

that is most certainly an odd looking plane but no witnesses ever made any mention of any sort of propeller.

The reason why I raised the questions is that I came across some pictures of the Stoystown Fire Dept doing hazmat and terror attack training. They are all dressed the same has on 9/11 and at least a few of the guys in the training pictures are the same ones pictured on 9/11.

Also, the fact that they only sent an antique fire engine to respond to a passenger jet crash seems odd to say the least.

The response to the Crash of Flight 93 on 9/11

Most likey the reason that that particular truck was sent is because the location was off road and that truck weighs much less than a standard pumper loaded with 3000 gallons of water, tons of gear and hose, and is less likely to get stuck.

Here they still use 1950's vintage military vehicles converted to firetrucks for off road emergencies.