| Viewing Single Post From: Witnesses List Broken Down | |
|---|---|
| Caustic Logic | Jan 20 2008, 05:41 AM |
|
No flyover witnesses, the flyover having been masked by the explosion. Alright... so how many people saw it fly upward to the spot it passed thru? One we hear, Turcios, who's not in the Citgo video where he says he was at, had the mound block his dorect view of impact, but NOT his view of the pull-up, and still seems to think it impacted. No one else - all either low and level or low and slight nose-down. So if a fireball can hide a momentary passover, what can hide a hundreds-of-feet up upward travel to get there? If it flew north it had to fly over and if it flew over it had to PULL UP. And no one of that big list but this one liar has ever said that. And to clarify, CIT is right that north side means flyover, or perhaps flyunder, or disappearance at impact (ie hologram, etc), take your pic. This is because there is no impact damage to the building consistent with that path. It can't hit at one angle and plow thru at another. So these witnesses, to the extent each is clear on the north path point, are either right, or mistaken (and the list is growing), somehow grossly misread. or wrong on purpose. Again, take your pic. |
![]() |
|
| Witnesses List Broken Down · Pentagon | |




11:14 AM Dec 4