Miragememories

 

"It all comes down to quality.

The quality of the NofCitgo testimony is exceptionally good.

The quality of the Pentagon aircraft impact testimony is marginal.

The quality of the visual evidence supporting a SofCitgo flightpath lacks proven
continuity to the Pentagon explosion and is therefore unsubstantiated.

You are entitled to your gut instinct (incredulity supporting assumptive wishful thinking)
as well as your 3rd party opinion that the eyewitness testimony is unsatisfactory.

Until you can present an argument of substance that does more than just repeat again your incredulity
HeadLikeARock, I suggest you go back to those lunar forums you favor, and continue beating
your head against moon rocks."

HeadLikeARock

 

"Suggestion noted, considered and rejected.

I'll post where I like, and on whatever subject that interests me, regardless of your attempts to brow-beat me off the forum."