Viewing Single Post From: South Side/Light Pole eyewitnesses

Viewing Single Post From: South Side/Light Pole eyewitnesses
HeadLikeARock	Apr 2 2009, 07:48 AM
Posts: 345 Group: Members Member #438 Joined: 03/25/08	Miragememories Apr 1 2009, 06:47 AM The quality of the NofCitgo testimony is exceptionally good. The quality of the Pentagon aircraft impact testimony is marginal. Why is Sean Boger's graphic description of the impact marginal rather than good? Why is Sgt Lagasse's insistence that the impact is "non-negotiable", marginal rather than good? Why is Father McGraw's eye-witness testimony of the impact marginal rather than good? Why is Penny Elgas graphic recollection of the impact marginal rather than good? Why is Albert Hemphill's view of the impact from the Navy Annex marginal rather than good? Quote: The quality of the visual evidence supporting a SofCitgo flightpath lacks proven continuity to the Pentagon explosion and is therefore unsubstantiated. Please explain what proven continuity is necessary, and what would constitute proof. Quote: You are entitled to your gut instinct (incredulity supporting assumptive wishful thinking) as well as your 3rd party opinion that the eyewitness testimony is unsatisfactory. The eye-witness reports are contradictory. That's not my opinion, it's a fact. Take Sgt Lagasse's statement that the only 2 things he saw that are "non-negotiable" are a NoC approach, and the impact itself. As for incredulity, aren't you basing your dismissal of the lightpole/taxicab incident on incredulity? You don't believe it couldn't have missed the bonnet, so you reject the evidence based on your own disbelief?
Posts: 345 Group: Members Member #438 Joined: 03/25/08

South Side/Light Pole eyewitnesses · Skeptics