Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Viewing Single Post From: There Was No Missile At the Pentagon
Craig Ranke CIT Apr 1 2009, 10:59 AM
Member Avatar
A.L.Ex - N.E.T.A
Apr 1 2009, 06:48 AM
Something obvuiously made the damage ..... well duh! Yes i am aware that pre-planted explosive are very likely but I doubt they would put them them so that the damage line would be longer than that of what A 757 would make.

Except that there isn't a reason on earth to think that the "damage line" is any "longer than that of what a 757 would make".

Remember, the rings between the E & C ring are not separated by walls on the bottom two floors.

It's nothing but a maze of columns.
Posted Image



You can tell by counting the rows of windows:
Posted Image

Quote:
 

And since when were witnesses not amount to evidence?


First-hand witness accounts whose actual location and true POV have been confirmed are evidence.

Unconfirmed out of context media quotes are hearsay.

That is what we have shown.

When forensically analyzed, the witnesses prove the plane did not hit.

AND that there was only one plane.

Quote:
 

I have no choice but to think a 757 hit because of the landing gear? The landing gear could be off something smaller, hell it could have been adrone specially fitted with the exact same as a 757 for all we know.


Please.

If you make a documentary with that in it you'll be a laughing stock.

DoD controlled photographs taken days after the event do not amount to independent evidence for anything.

There isn't a reason on earth to think that any of these few parts were there as the result of a plane crash.

Quote:
 

I'm not saying it was DEFINATELY a missle or drone, I'm saying it's retarded to discount these things. I hope you agree it was something that gives out a visible vaper trail.


As SPreston just made clear, the security video is NOT valid independent evidence.

It is DoD controlled proven manipulated evidence. And the "smoke trail" that NOBODY reports witnessing is the most blatantly manipulated part of it.

Quote:
 

Know for a FACT because I disagree with you do you? Horseshit, sorry. How can you say that witnesses saying they saw a plane hit the building does NOT support this? DO YOU SAY THAT NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON SAY THEY SAW A HIT?


I'm telling you what there is evidence for.

You can "disagree" all you want but your speculation means nothing if you can't provide independent evidence to back it up which you haven't.

The fact is that the evidence proves that the plane did NOT hit so whoever says they saw it hit has been deceived or is lying.



Edited by Craig Ranke CIT, Apr 1 2009, 11:54 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post
There Was No Missile At the Pentagon · Pentagon