Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Viewing Single Post From: South Side/Light Pole eyewitnesses
Miragememories
Member Avatar

espresso
 
"My point was that the multiple verifications of the actual impact pose a problem for the NoC flight path. Whether or not these eyewitnesses mentioned the citgo is irrelevant since NoC is impossible if the plane impacted."

tuatara
 
"Multiple verifications of the NoC flight path pose a problem for the actual impact. Whether or not these eyewitnesses mention an impact is irrelevant since a SoC path is impossible."

HeadLikeARock
 
"This is where the heart of the contradiction lies.
If the eye-witness reports of an impact are correct, and the photographic and video evidence of damage to the Pentagon is a true record, then the NoC reports are unreliable.

If the NoC witness statements are reliable, then any witnesses to an impact were either fooled or are liars, and the record of physical was concocted.

At present, I don't see how it's possible to be certain either way. I have my gut instinct, just as you have yours, but to say a SoC path is impossible based on eye-witness testimony to me is unsatisfactory."


It all comes down to quality.

I suggest you start by reading ZEN AND THE ART OF MOTORCYCLE MAINTENANCE.

The quality of the NofCitgo testimony is exceptionally good.

The quality of the Pentagon aircraft impact testimony is marginal.

The quality of the visual evidence supporting a SofCitgo flightpath lacks proven
continuity
to the Pentagon explosion and is therefore unsubstantiated.

You are entitled to your gut instinct (incredulity supporting assumptive wishful thinking) as well as
your 3rd party opinion that the eyewitness testimony is unsatisfactory.

Until you can present an argument of substance that does more than just repeat
again your incredulity HeadLikeARock, I suggest you go back to those
lunar forums you favor, and continue beating your head against moon rocks.

MM
Edited by Miragememories, Apr 1 2009, 08:03 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post
South Side/Light Pole eyewitnesses · Skeptics