Viewing Single Post From: South Side/Light Pole eyewitnesses

Viewing Single Post From: South Side/Light Pole eyewitnesses
HeadLikeARock	Apr 1 2009, 05:54 AM
Posts: 345 Group: Members Member #438 Joined: 03/25/08	tuatara Mar 26 2009, 03:47 PM espresso Mar 26 2009, 02:47 PM My point was that the multiple verifications of the actual impact pose a problem for the NoC flight path. Whether or not these eyewitnesses mentioned the citgo is irrelevant since NoC is impossible if the plane impacted. Multiple verifications of the NoC flight path pose a problem for the actual impact. Whether or not these eyewitnesses mention an impact is irrelevant since a SoC path is impossible. This is where the heart of the contradiction lies. If the eye-witness reports of an impact are correct, and the photographic and video evidence of damage to the Pentagon is a true record, then the NoC reports are unreliable. If the NoC witness statements are reliable, then any witnesses to an impact were either fooled or are liars, and the record of physical was concocted. At present, I don't see how it's possible to be certain either way. I have my gut instinct, just as you have yours, but to say a SoC path is impossible based on eye-witness testimony to me is unsatisfactory.
Posts: 345 Group: Members Member #438 Joined: 03/25/08

South Side/Light Pole eyewitnesses · Skeptics