Viewing Single Post From: The official story can be disproven in <3minutes

Viewing Single Post From: The official story can be disproven in <3minutes
Guerilla Radio	Mar 31 2009, 05:58 PM
Posts: 19 Group: Members Member #1,106 Joined: 03/28/09	Quote: I thought I made it clear that NIST was wrong. And the source is the very link you posted that says: Hmm...so after thousands of pages technical pages written on the subject, of all the hundreds of brilliant scientific minds working at the NIST, and yet none of them know how to count? So tell me, what else is NIST wrong about? Have you made them aware of this gross error so that they might take prompt steps to correct it? Quote: Instead of questioning, why don't you watch several videos of the collapse and time the collapses yourself. It's really easy. I have, and there is nothing in the collapse videos that is inconsistent with freefall speed. Regardless, freefall speed has little to do with the premise of the video I posted. That is, the upper section could not have collapsed through the much larger section all the way to the ground, REGARDLESS of the speed. The VW Bug cannot go through the school bus, freefall or not. The basic laws of physics still apply, even on 9/11. Edited by Guerilla Radio, Mar 31 2009, 06:06 PM.
Posts: 19 Group: Members Member #1,106 Joined: 03/28/09

The official story can be disproven in <3minutes · World Trade Center