| Viewing Single Post From: No Jet Fuel at the Flight 93 Crash Site | |
|---|---|
| SPreston | Mar 31 2009, 04:06 PM |
|
Patriotic American
|
There is no sign of jet fuel saturating the soil around this rusty old boneyard engine piece they used for this photo op is there? They expect us to believe that alleged 6 ton RB-211 turbofan engine only buried about a foot underground in soft soil at 563 mph? That rusty old engine gives the appearance or has been staged to look like it is still partially buried just where they found it. Those guys are standing at ground level and there is about a foot of soil above the alleged engine. Of course they could have dug it up from way deeper and then partially buried it again. But why would they have to do that? It looks like it would fit in that backhoe bucket perfectly, doesn't it? Drop it down, nudge it over sideways into the soft soil, dig a little earth out below it, and presto instant photo op for the bad guys. And of course the dry grass and weeds around the alleged hole were untouched by flame or jet fuel. How would the jet fuel allegedly exploding out of the ruptured wing tanks not be expected to splash all over the surrounding vegatation? Perhaps using 20/20 hindsight, the FBI agents should have rented a flame thrower and cleaned up the crime scene. ![]() Official original file photo |
![]() |
|
| No Jet Fuel at the Flight 93 Crash Site · Investigate 9/11 | |





4:17 AM Dec 1