|
Viewing Single Post From: The official story can be disproven in <3minutes
|
|
Guerilla Radio
|
Mar 31 2009, 02:32 PM
|
|
- Posts:
- 19
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #1,106
- Joined:
- 03/28/09
|
- TDX
- Mar 29 2009, 03:15 AM
wake up
this is 2009
the video is totally outdated and wrong, the towers didn't collapse at anything near to freefall speed (excluding WTC7)
I would expect something like that in 2004
and I'm angry at the majority of truth movement for tolerating this vids, the video made it to the news section of 9/11 blogger
achimspok's and my videos didn't make it.........
if you really want to have arguments, which are based on actual physics, then go and watch achimspok on youtube, or look for heiwa's site
Have you read the NIST report? Apparently you never bothered to, because if you did you would know that NIST states on their website that the towers fell at freefall speeds. They calculated 9 seconds for the South Tower, 11 secs for the North tower. That is free fall speed, as NIST freely admits. The collapse times are not in dispute, except from those who don't know any better such as yourself.
From NIST FAQs page:
- Quote:
-
6. How could the WTC towers collapse in only 11 seconds (WTC 1) and 9 seconds (WTC 2)—speeds that approximate that of a ball dropped from similar height in a vacuum (with no air resistance)? NIST estimated the elapsed times for the first exterior panels to strike the ground after the collapse initiated in each of the towers to be approximately 11 seconds for WTC 1 and approximately 9 seconds for WTC 2. These elapsed times were based on: (1) precise timing of the initiation of collapse from video evidence, and (2) ground motion (seismic) signals recorded at Palisades, N.Y., that also were precisely time-calibrated for wave transmission times from lower Manhattan (see NCSTAR 1-5A). http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
|
|
|
7:16 PM Nov 28
