Viewing Single Post From: No Jet Fuel at the Flight 93 Crash Site

Viewing Single Post From: No Jet Fuel at the Flight 93 Crash Site
swingdangler	Mar 31 2009, 02:32 PM
Posts: 20 Group: Members Member #737 Joined: 07/14/08	Mick Mar 13 2009, 07:07 PM Domenick DiMaggio Mar 13 2009, 01:03 AM because i know that when that photo was allegedly taken there was a small white plane directly above it. i have corroborated it with 3 witnesses on top of susan mcelwain, one being rick chaney. The photo only shows a limited portion of the sky above the smoke. Why is there no reason to believe that the small white plane if it was there was not simply above the frame of the photo that was taken? For the skeptic- video of airplane crash high speed into ground. http://www.metacafe.com/watch/913349/show_plane_crash/ A slower speed but you get the point: http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1952312/amazing_plane_crash/ Keep in mind the speed of the plane is really inconsequential compared to the depth of ground penetration with regards to the fuel burn. Seriously, the wings are not going to wait until they penetrate several feet into the ground before exploding, they are going to explode on impact with the ground not impact and then penetration into the ground. Not only does Dom research serve as proof, Jeff Shure from pumpitout.com talked to surrounding residents on the phone and they even claim the photo is fake. Dom and others , have you considered the possibility that the drone or white airplane seen flying around was purposely crashed at Shanksville to serve the cover story? Edited by swingdangler, Mar 31 2009, 02:34 PM.
Posts: 20 Group: Members Member #737 Joined: 07/14/08

No Jet Fuel at the Flight 93 Crash Site · Investigate 9/11