Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Viewing Single Post From: There Was No Missile At the Pentagon
Craig Ranke CIT
Member Avatar

A.L.Ex - N.E.T.A
Mar 29 2009, 01:12 PM


The rings not being divided means NOTHING. Something still made it that far into the Pentagon and it would have to be something big and heavy and we both know it wasn't a plane.

Of course something made the damage but there is no evidence that it was a plane, missile, or anything that flew into the building.

Since we know the M.O. of this operation at the WTC was to covertly cause the destruction with pre-planted explosives this is a a logical conclusion at the Pentagon in light of the body of independent evidence available.

A.L.Ex - N.E.T.A
 

Well done, I'm not speculating.


Clearly you are since you have not provided a single piece of independent evidence for a missile or a drone aircraft impact.

Hint: government controlled and supplied information is not independent verifiable evidence.

A.L.Ex - N.E.T.A
 

NO evidence? This you're gonna have to explain because, other than the landing gear found on site and the thin pieces of "fuselage", around 30 people say they SAW a plane directly hit the building and we both know it wasn't Flight 77, so unless it was a 3-D image being projected to trick everyone, there's not much else of an explanation (funny enough the crazy 3-D idea would explain why no one heard anything).


We have personally talked with many witnesses who heard and saw the plane.

The witnesses prove it was on the north side and therefore did not hit the building and was manipulated out of the fraudulent security video.

Please view the entire body of evidence before continuing to argue against it because at this point it is quite apparent that you haven't.

And if you really believe the "landing gear" photographed inside the building after 9/11 got there from a plane impact then you have no choice but to accept a 757 impact because it matches a 757 as does the combustion case and wheel rim.


Posted Image
Posted Image

This is already very well known by most so if you try claiming otherwise you are setting yourself up to be easily debunked.


No doubt it was already inside the building before the attack and the few tiny scraps of un-charred fuselage sections laying around for photo-ops could have been planted at any point just prior to or during the attack.

There really wasn't much. Here is the extent of the somewhat recognizable pieces:
Posted Image

Do you really think they just got lucky that no parts that could be definitively traced to an A3 skywarrior or Global Hawk could be identified?

And if you are really going to argue that the witnesses actually support a plane impact then I know for a FACT that you have not viewed the evidence we present.

Please do.
Offline Profile Quote Post
There Was No Missile At the Pentagon · Pentagon