| Viewing Single Post From: The official story can be disproven in <3minutes | |
|---|---|
| TDX | Mar 30 2009, 09:24 AM |
|
No, the collapses looked something like that: 0s - core starts to collapse due to severe thermite/explosives useage ( respectively some core rows....), (then continuing to fall down at freefall speed, inside the elevator shafts, the squibs....) 0,5-0,7s first glimpses of failure are visible on the exterior walls 0,5-4s the perimeter failures are spreading acros the entire perimeter, that causes tillting in the upper sections ( downward displacemnt = 0-5 floors) 4s- the upper sections of the towers are in full fall 9s the elements of the core in freefall hit the ground 11-12s freefalling elements outside the building are reaching ground 20+ seconds - the upper sections are reaching ground, while decelerating rapidly, due to the vast ammount of debris 30s+ the last standing elements - the spires- are starting to collapse ............. thanks to achimspok in short - the simple freefall argument holds no water, afterall we can not say how much time would take natural collapse, we don't even know the exact numbers for weight distribution inside the towers........ however, we are absolutely sure that the core elements (100 tons+) were at freefall inside the shafts.....that alone proves CD well, as for achimspok, AE911truth.org knows, but because they don't give a shit, there will be no english version...... now, he's making vids with large captions and english translator voice........ but, I have a few vids in HD from him, so you can see the letters..... http://www.megaupload.com/?d=IB3S83WG http://rapidshare.com/files/209083640/Part1_Chapter_25.mp4.html http://www.megaupload.com/?d=DANBT6B5 |
 |
|
| The official story can be disproven in <3minutes · World Trade Center | |
8:15 AM Dec 1
