Viewing Single Post From: Sgt Lagasse Stands By Placement of the Plane

Viewing Single Post From: Sgt Lagasse Stands By Placement of the Plane
HeadLikeARock	Mar 27 2009, 08:50 AM
Posts: 345 Group: Members Member #438 Joined: 03/25/08	Miragememories Mar 25 2009, 04:50 PM Unless you folks, and I mean specifically HeadLikeARock, bryan26 and espresso, intend to bring something new to this thread which actually casts some 'real' doubt on Sgt Lagasse's NofCitgo testimony, I would suggest that your continued repetition of the same lame arguments, is nothing short of a deliberate attempt to "muddy the waters". Sgt Lagasse said that the only two things that are non-negotiable are the that plane flew NoC, and that it hit the Pentagon. Similarly with Sean Boger. He said it flew NoC, he also said he saw it fly into the Pentagon. Penny Elgas described the plane in some detail as it entered the building. IIRC the details were quite clear. The rest of her statement could be construed as supporting either SoC or NoC, because it isn't clear exactly where she was, or what side of the CITGO she saw the plane. (I don't think CIT managed to interview her for clarification.) The waters are already muddied because some of the major witnesses make self-contradictory statements. Some of them also make statements that conflict with what other witnesses say. This isn't me or anyone else trying to confuse the issue. I'm pointing out that the issue is already confused, unless you choose to rule out every witness statement that supports an impact or SoC approach as being inadmissible.
Posts: 345 Group: Members Member #438 Joined: 03/25/08

Sgt Lagasse Stands By Placement of the Plane · Skeptics