Viewing Single Post From: Sgt Lagasse Stands By Placement of the Plane

Viewing Single Post From: Sgt Lagasse Stands By Placement of the Plane
bryan26	Mar 26 2009, 09:02 AM
troll Posts: 66 Group: BANNED! Member #1,067 Joined: 02/23/09	Miragememories Mar 25 2009, 04:50 PM Unless you folks, and I mean specifically HeadLikeARock, bryan26 and espresso, intend to bring something new to this thread which actually casts some 'real' doubt on Sgt Lagasse's NofCitgo testimony, I would suggest that your continued repetition of the same lame arguments, is nothing short of a deliberate attempt to "muddy the waters". Myself and others here have put a great deal of time, effort and patience into explaining why Sgt Lagasse's NofCitgo testimony should stand, only to see our responses buried under rhetoric that reveals no sincere interest in a genuine discussion. Your strategy appears to be, always have the last word no matter how empty, and bloat this thread with as much mind numbing irrelevance as possible, in the hope that visitors doing sincere research will give the thread a pass. In short, sabotage the thread with lots of bs. If you can't bring anything new to the table and can't negate the credibility of Sgt Lagasse and the 12 eyewitnesses who have gone on record and corroborated his testimony, then I accuse you of intentionally mocking this thread and the sincere members who have supported it! MM Is it possible for Lagasse and others to be wrong? YES!!!!!!! Is it possible for the plane to sync with an explosion and fool everyone in the vacinity at all POVs into thinking it hit the building? NO!!!!! ( the plane would have to fly into the first floor to appear to cause that explosion) Is it possible for the plane to hit 5 light poles( one wing hit two, one wing hit thee) knocking them over and still have enough momentum to reach and slam into the pentgon, only a very very short distance away? YES!!!!! Is it possible for a single massive explosion to produce all of the damage in and around the pentagon, appearing as if something, like a large jet, crashed into it? NO!!!!!!!! Those are just a couple, but there are many. You keep talking about Lagasse can't be wrong, but the cab didn't just appear out of thin air, damaged with pole and glass debris surrounding it in the middle of rush hour traffic. The trailor was not damaged by a stationary explosion. The lawn debris was not blown out of some trailor with a planted explosion ( where are the remains of the trailor). The witnesses on the lawn who dove out of the way of the plane, have not been shown to be lying and helping to kill thousands. The three pentagon rings were not damaged by preplaced explosives. The people on rte 27 who watched the plane crash into the pentagon, did not see a plane disappear into the building, unless that is what it did. The witnesses who saw the plane hit the building have not all been shown to be lying, mistaken, asleep, listening to the radio, putting on makeup, closing their eyes in fear, in a trance, blind, reaching into the glove compartment, etc. You cannot discount all of the witness with one generalized statement and give the noc witnesses every benefit of the doubt. What kind of investigator are you? All impact witnesses are soc witnesses, because the plane could not have hit any other way. There is nothing to say that it is impossible for the plane to hit the poles, pole hit the cab, plane hit the pentagon. All physical evidence and most witness testimony conclusively shows that a large jetliner flew into the pentagon. If noc is true there would be other evidence, not just a few people saying what they perceived.


Sgt Lagasse Stands By Placement of the Plane · Skeptics