| Viewing Single Post From: No Jet Fuel at the Flight 93 Crash Site | |
|---|---|
| NK-44 | Mar 12 2009, 11:24 PM |
|
No, it's not. Compare with footage from other air plane crashes and explosions. Never ever had all the fuel burned within a single mushroom-shaped cloud, without being followed by smoke from the subsequent fires. When doing so, you will also notice that the smoke clouds have a darker, almost black, appearance. Either the picture is faked, or the it shows something different than officially stated. Flight 93: ![]() Edit by JFK - replaced copyrighted image with a public domain one before Zetaboards removes this thread for copyright infingement. Please do not post "The end of Serenity" here as this has caused problems in the past. Others: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Watch this clip of a B-52 crash. Compare the Shanksville picture to one of an ordnance blast: ![]()
Mike, please read the source carefully:
No contamination means no contamination. There was none. It does not just state that it was safe. It says there was no contamination. And there's not much contamination of water with jet-fuel needed to make it unsafe. Edited by JFK, Mar 12 2009, 11:36 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| No Jet Fuel at the Flight 93 Crash Site · Investigate 9/11 | |










2:30 PM Dec 3